chitika1

chitika

Showing posts with label genuine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label genuine. Show all posts

Monday, September 13, 2010

Microsoft to probe charges of antipiracy abuses

Microsoft's top lawyer said on Monday that the company is taking action in the wake of a report that its antipiracy efforts have been used by the Russian government as a means to monitor computers of dissident groups in that country.
In a blog post, general counsel Brad Smith said that the company is hiring an outside law firm to investigate a report in The New York Times that the Russian government has used Microsoft's antipiracy efforts as a pretext to search computers of potential dissidents and, separately, that some lawyers hired by Microsoft have worked with corrupt police to shake down businesses over the piracy issue.
The company also plans to take other steps, including a plan to make it easier for nonprofit groups and newspapers in some countries to get access to free copies of its software in an effort to prevent such abuses.
"We want to be clear that we unequivocally abhor any attempt to leverage intellectual property rights to stifle political advocacy or pursue improper personal gain," Smith said in a blog post. "We are moving swiftly to seek to remove any incentive or ability to engage in such behavior."

Smith's comments follow a weekend report in The New York Times that the Russian government has been using the pretext of checking for counterfeit Microsoft software to search the computers of groups it wishes to monitor. The Times article suggests that lawyers hired by Microsoft have backed the tactic, while a second article said that that some of the private attorneys hired by Microsoft may have been part of a separate scheme collaborating with corrupt police to extort money from businesses over the piracy issue.                                                                                                    Brad Smith
(Credit: Microsoft)
"As general counsel for Microsoft, it was not the type of story that felt good to read," Smith said. "It described instances in which authorities had used piracy charges concerning Microsoft software to confiscate computers and harass non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and others engaged in public advocacy. It suggested that there had been cases when our own counsel at law firms had failed to help clear things up and had made matters worse instead."
Smith said that the next step for the company is "clear-cut."
"We must accept responsibility and assume accountability for our anti-piracy work, including the good and the bad," Smith wrote in the blog post. "At this point some of the specific facts are less clear than we would like. We will retain an international law firm that has not been involved in the anti-piracy work to conduct an independent investigation, report on its conclusions, and advise us of new measures we should take."
In addition, Smith said that Microsoft is changing the way it licenses software to nongovernmental organizations in Russia and helping the groups document to authorities that they have legal software. The company will also work over the next month to strengthen efforts to prevent those working for Microsoft or claiming to do so from extorting money over the piracy issue.
"Our team in Russia had already started work to address this by creating a list on the web of our authorized counsel, so that anyone can review this and readily check someone's claim that they represent Microsoft," Smith said. "This is a good step, but we can and should do more."
At the same time, reducing piracy is a huge issue for Microsoft, particularly in emerging markets such as Russia.
"It costs jobs and business growth and can cheat consumers who think they're paying for genuine products," Smith said. "We know for a fact that the reduction of software piracy has breathed new life into Russia's own software industry and has created new jobs in our industry, both at Russian software companies and for U.S. software exporters. But none of this should create a pretext for the inappropriate pursuit of NGOs, newspapers, or other participants in civil society. And we certainly don't want to contribute to any such effort, even inadvertently."
Smith said the new steps should help avoid that, but pledged the company would take further action, if necessary.
The lengthy blog post follows an earlier statement from Kevin Kutz, Microsoft's director of public affairs. Kutz said over the weekend that the company has been in discussions with various human rights groups regarding issues in Russia and has taken several new steps, including increasing monitoring and training of its outside lawyers and making available on its Russian Web site the names of those officials who are representing the company.
"We have to protect our products from piracy, but we also have a commitment to respect fundamental human rights," Kutz said. "Microsoft anti-piracy efforts are designed to honor both objectives, but we are open to feedback on what we can do to improve in that regard."

Thursday, September 9, 2010

An electric fuel cell powered by your own body:CHANNEL YOUR PERSONAL POWER

Here’s a new one. An electric fuel cell 

powered by your own body. We’ll take a look, today on 

Engineering Works!


  •  Lightweight, compact devices could power medical devices. 
  • Eat a Snickers bar to power up.


                                                         These days, everybody’s looking for new sources of electricity. All our portable electronics  -- iPods, cell phones, laptops -- they all need good batteries to keep playing or talking or 
 calculating. The batteries we have really aren’t that good. They’re not much better than the voltaic pile battery Alessandro Volta invented more than 200 years ago.

Engineering researchers are looking into a new power source. They’re looking, well, into themselves. 

 
It’s pretty simple – and complicated, all at the same time. Imagine a small chip – called a biofuel cell – that uses sugar and oxygen to generate electricity. Now, imagine that biofuel cell is implanted in your arm. The oxygen and sugar is in your blood. Can you see it now? Electricity. It’s always there and always being recharged. Running low on power? Grab a Coke or a candy bar. 


The engineers really aren’t interested in a new way for you to power your iPod. Not yet, anyway. They’re looking for lightweight, compact, dependable ways for astronauts to power things like medical sensors in space. Now, they’re getting ready to send one up in a satellite to see how well it does in orbit. No people. Just tiny tanks of sugar and oxygen. The people will come later, they hope.


Well, our iPod sounds like it’s going flat. Guess we need to grab a Snickers bar. See you next time.  

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Audit finds PG&E smart meters accurate

A smart meter from PG&E
(Credit: PG&E)
An independent review of smart meters installed in Northern California by utility Pacific Gas & Electric found no technical flaws, but a poor roll-out with customers.
The California Public Utilities Commission on Thursday released the evaluation of PG&E's controversial smart-meter program, which was conducted by consulting company The Structure Group.
After PG&E installed two-way meters in Bakersfield, Calif., customers complained that their utility prices shot up, which they blamed on the new meters. Since then, there have been questions over PG&E's handling of the program by regulators and push-back from various communities in its territory.
Earlier this summer, the CPUC contracted with Structure, which tested 750 smart meters and 147 old electromechanical meters. The test found that smart meters reported accurately and that customer billing matched the expected results.
However, Structure identified problems in PG&E's customer service. In reviewing 1,378 customer complaints, Structure said PG&E didn't meet industry standards, leading to people receiving multiple bills or not having questions about smart meters answered.


"The report is encouraging in terms of the performance of actual meter hardware. However, I am very concerned about PG&E's performance in terms of industry best practices and how in some of the best practices areas, PG&E's performance has actually declined,"  

  CPUC Commissioner Dian Grueneich said in a statement.
PG&E's rocky experiences in rolling out smart meters in California has taken on national significance with other utilities trying to learn from PG&E's missteps in introducing the new technology. PG&E's meters allow people to view their energy usage on a daily basis, which helps people better understand their consumption and save energy.
In another case, smart meter installations by utility Oncor in Texas have created complaints from consumers over prices. A review found that that those meters are accurate.
Earlier this year, PG&E released an internal report identifying problems with its smart meter program, which led to a revamp of its customer service operations aimed at better educating customers. About 6.6 million gas and electric meters have been installed so far and the company plans to install 10 million by 2012.
Apart from the accuracy of meters, consumer groups are raising health concerns about the electromagnetic field from smart meters, which transmit information once an hour using a radio frequency.
On its Web site, PG&E says that radio frequency emissions from smart meters are lower than other common electronic devices, such as Wi-Fi routers and cell phones. At a press conference on Thursday, PG&E's Chief Customer Officer Helen Burt echoed those statements and pointed to experts on this question.
A number of cities and towns in PG&E's territory have considered moratoriums on smart meter installations. Senior Vice President of Corporate Affairs Greg Pruett said that PG&E is holding open houses with customers and other groups. "We genuinely believe as we work and talk with customers and show that we are genuinely interested in listening to them...ultimately those cities and counties considering moratoriums will reconsider that desire," he said.



Related Posts with Thumbnails